Hi,
as I've said on another thread, I'm a couple months into getting back in the gym. My most obvious goal is fat loss. However, I happen to really enjoy exercise, and I like working hard. I push myself, especially in cardio, because it is more fun that way than to just half-way go at it and get bored...
I've been watching my heart rate, and I realize that I am keeping myself in the "cardio training" zone or even a little above that, rather than in the "fat burning" zone. Last workout I burned nearly 1000 calories easily... but only 30% were fat calories according to my monitor, since my average heart rate was well above the limits for fat burning.

Am I shooting myself in the foot? Do I really need to ease up and work in the recommended 160-170 bpm range, or will I still see the same fat loss results working at a more enjoyable 175-185 bpm range? I had been operating under the assumption that is some is good, more is better in regards to how hard I work.
Thanks for any input!
As I said in my other thread, I'm 25 years old, 5'10", female, looking to lose ~40 lb., and my body naturally builds and carries muscle quickly and easily. My workouts are usually 4 times a week, where schedule allows, 10 min warm up run (10 min. mile pace), machines in circuit fashion alternating body parts (HR staying around mid 150's, sometimes into low 160's), then 20-35 min. cardio (HR ranging 175-185, depending on how vigorous I'm feeling that day, and mixing it up throughout the cardio session).
~tellico joe