| New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login |
|
Football Ranking
 |
Football Ranking |
 |
November 27th, 2006, 01:08 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
EF Big Dog
offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Central, Louisiana
Posts: 247
Thanks given: 34
33 thanks in 26 posts
|
Football Ranking
What does your NFL top 5 look like?
1. Colts
2. Baltimore
2. Chargers
4. Dallas
5. Patriots
I have Chargers and Baltimore as a tie for 2nd. Great D VS Great O.
Chicago proved to me that they can't do anything against a strong team, so they drop out.
|
|
|
|
|
November 27th, 2006, 01:12 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
How YOU's Doin'?!?
offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,950
Thanks given: 519
649 thanks in 252 posts
|
1. Colts
2. Ravens
3. Chargers
4. Patriots
5. Bears
Chicago proved to me that through a comedy of errors they lost the game, it was not won by the patriots but given to them.
|
|
|
|
|
November 27th, 2006, 03:24 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
EFPD SWAT Stallion
offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. FlOriDa
Posts: 1,318
Thanks given: 565
1,121 thanks in 472 posts
|
1. Colts
2. Patriots
3. Chargers
4. Jets............just for fun
5. Dolphins.........just for fun....the top 3 teams r what i mentioned everyone else is beatable i think..no 1 has established to be amazing other than thsoe 3
|
|
|
|
|
November 27th, 2006, 05:33 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
EF JACKASS
offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Somewhere between happy and total f*%king wreck.
Posts: 1,018
Thanks given: 180
222 thanks in 103 posts
|
1. Raiders
2.Who cares
Really tho
1.Cowboys
2.Colts
3.Pats
4.Bears
5.Ravens
Last edited by joker13; November 27th, 2006 at 07:35 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
November 27th, 2006, 05:35 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
EF Big Dog
offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 99
Thanks given: 79
1,228 thanks in 83 posts
|
Last edited by neptune; February 15th, 2009 at 12:51 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
November 27th, 2006, 06:42 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
DIVEMASTER
offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 2,766
Thanks given: 291
524 thanks in 167 posts
|
1. Chargers
2. Ravens
3. Colts
4. Patriots
5. Cowboys/Bears (too close to call)
The Pats made more errors than the Bears & had some huge (long yardage) calls against them & still pulled it out. It wasn't given to them, they took it.
|
|
|
|
|
November 27th, 2006, 07:07 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Chairman Meow
offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Near Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,496
Thanks given: 406
600 thanks in 229 posts
|
1. San Diego
2. Baltimore
3. Indianapolis
4. New England
5. Dallas
|
|
|
|
|
November 28th, 2006, 08:11 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 185
Thanks given: 70
118 thanks in 50 posts
Rep Power: 5
|
that loss to the patriots was rex grossmans fault. I know that it is a huge thing to say, but if you saw the game, you would understand. he fumbled a snap and threw i think 6 ints.
|
|
|
|
|
November 28th, 2006, 08:44 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
EF Big Dog
offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 49
Thanks given: 0
10 thanks in 4 posts
|
1. Colts
2. Ravens
3. Bears
4. Pats
5. Saints - with a healthy Colston
Last edited by mattlange26; November 28th, 2006 at 08:44 PM.
Reason: addition
|
|
|
|
|
November 28th, 2006, 08:46 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
DIVEMASTER
offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 2,766
Thanks given: 291
524 thanks in 167 posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake15
that loss to the patriots was rex grossmans fault. I know that it is a huge thing to say, but if you saw the game, you would understand. he fumbled a snap and threw i think 6 ints.
|
I was at the game, it was 3 ints.
Grossman did have a poor game, but it was sloppy on both sides. 9 turnovers total. Pats 5, Bears 4.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 AM.
|
|
