| New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login |
 
|
want some cloned meat?
 |
want some cloned meat? |
 |
January 15th, 2008, 12:09 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Pro Fitness / Figure Diva
offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,813
Thanks given: 2,444
2,233 thanks in 1,135 posts
|
want some cloned meat?
WASHINGTON - A long-awaited final report from the Food and Drug Administration concludes that foods from healthy cloned animals and their offspring are as safe as those from ordinary animals, effectively removing the last U.S. regulatory barrier to the marketing of meat and milk from cloned cattle, pigs and goats.
The 968-page "final risk assessment," not yet released but obtained by The Washington Post, finds no evidence to support concerns that food from clones might harbor hidden risks.
Recognizing that most consumers are wary of food from clones -- and that cloning could undermine the wholesome image of American milk and meat -- the report includes hundreds of pages of raw data to reveal how it came to its conclusions.
The report also acknowledges that human health concerns aren't the only issues raised by the emergence of cloned farm animals.
"Moral, religious and ethical concerns ... have been raised," the agency notes.
It will be years before foods from clones make their way to store shelves in appreciable quantities, in part because clones are too valuable to slaughter or milk. Instead, the pricey animals -- replicas of some of the finest farm animals ever born -- will be used primarily as breeding stock to create what proponents say will be a new generation of superior farm animals.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
January 15th, 2008, 12:54 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
EF Ball Buster!
offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 681
Thanks given: 536
1,096 thanks in 407 posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Italianangel
WASHINGTON - A long-awaited final report from the Food and Drug Administration concludes that foods from healthy cloned animals and their offspring are as safe as those from ordinary animals, effectively removing the last U.S. regulatory barrier to the marketing of meat and milk from cloned cattle, pigs and goats.
The 968-page "final risk assessment," not yet released but obtained by The Washington Post, finds no evidence to support concerns that food from clones might harbor hidden risks.
Recognizing that most consumers are wary of food from clones -- and that cloning could undermine the wholesome image of American milk and meat -- the report includes hundreds of pages of raw data to reveal how it came to its conclusions.
The report also acknowledges that human health concerns aren't the only issues raised by the emergence of cloned farm animals.
"Moral, religious and ethical concerns ... have been raised," the agency notes.
It will be years before foods from clones make their way to store shelves in appreciable quantities, in part because clones are too valuable to slaughter or milk. Instead, the pricey animals -- replicas of some of the finest farm animals ever born -- will be used primarily as breeding stock to create what proponents say will be a new generation of superior farm animals.
|
Hey as long as it tastes good I really don't see the problem. Hell I would rather eat a 'clean' cloned animal as opposed to one that has been shot up with all kinds of hormones!
|
|
|
|
January 15th, 2008, 01:10 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
stuck in the middle
offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: montana
Posts: 640
Thanks given: 1,157
972 thanks in 348 posts
|
I'll pass. America has been the leader in suppling food for the world forever, this is a slap in the face to all ranchers across the country. I don't think you can clone as fast as raise animals and it can't be near as cost effective. The price for cloned meat has to be way higher.
|
|
|
|
|
justaguy87337 said Thanks
|
|
January 15th, 2008, 02:33 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
EF Ball Buster!
offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 681
Thanks given: 536
1,096 thanks in 407 posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by justaguy87337
I'll pass. America has been the leader in suppling food for the world forever, this is a slap in the face to all ranchers across the country. I don't think you can clone as fast as raise animals and it can't be near as cost effective. The price for cloned meat has to be way higher.
|
Yeah I wondered that too. However it says that they would create a type of 'super clone' just to breed from. Otherwise I can't see how it can be cost effective either.
What about throubred horses though? HMMMMM!!!! We could have like 9 Man O Wars running in one race. Who would win?
|
|
|
|
January 15th, 2008, 02:42 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
EF Top Dog
offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: in Canada, eh?
Posts: 720
Thanks given: 364
1,730 thanks in 551 posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JarheadRI
What about throubred horses though? HMMMMM!!!! We could have like 9 Man O Wars running in one race. Who would win?
|
That would depend. are the jockeys clones too?
|
|
|
|
January 15th, 2008, 02:47 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Don't tase me, bro
offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 806
Thanks given: 770
1,697 thanks in 597 posts
|
Not to jack the thread, but I'm looking forward to the day when we can use stem cells from pigs, cattle, chickens, etc. to grow meat tissue in factories rather than raising animals intended for slaughter. Sounds kinda sci-fi, but I wouldn't be surprised if this comes down the pipe. The environmental impact of requiring less pasture land and waste material alone could be staggering.
|
|
|
|
January 15th, 2008, 03:09 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
stuck in the middle
offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: montana
Posts: 640
Thanks given: 1,157
972 thanks in 348 posts
|
less pasture land....why do u need less....for more cities. What would you do with all the animals that are raised for slaughter? They cannot live in the wild and would become extinct...the pastures would then turn to dust...disrupting the ecosystem....causing more problems than it would solve.
|
|
|
|
|
justaguy87337 said Thanks
|
|
 |
|
 |
January 15th, 2008, 03:38 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Don't tase me, bro
offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 806
Thanks given: 770
1,697 thanks in 597 posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by justaguy87337
less pasture land....why do u need less....for more cities. What would you do with all the animals that are raised for slaughter? They cannot live in the wild and would become extinct...the pastures would then turn to dust...disrupting the ecosystem....causing more problems than it would solve.
|
The animals would live out their life cycle, just not be reproduced en masse. The man-made pastures would revert back to their natural terrain. Or, the fertile land could be used to grow other crops for human, rather than animal, consumption.
I mentioned the lack of need for pastures in recalling the growing population in South America (and need for cheaper meat) is causing thousands of acres of rainforest to be burned.. throwing tons of particulate matter into the atmosphere and reducing the earth's natural CO2 balance. There's also a significant impact caused by the run-off from animal ranches that pollute the water table.
|
|
|
|
January 15th, 2008, 03:47 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
stuck in the middle
offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: montana
Posts: 640
Thanks given: 1,157
972 thanks in 348 posts
|
so they are burning the rain forest to raise cattle? I thought it was urban development. Run off from ranches is far less of an impact than say.....industrial plants. Ranchers are stewards of their land, they care for it because that is money maker. If you take away the free range from ranchers then the land would go back to the government and well all know how well they can take care of things....it will be like our forrest overgrown and then becoming huge fire pits putting more particulate into the atmosphere.
|
|
|
|
|
justaguy87337 said Thanks
|
|
January 15th, 2008, 04:07 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
EF GUNNY SGT
offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: away from u
Posts: 2,507
Thanks given: 7,346
5,692 thanks in 2,121 posts
|
well if the cloned meat is so safe why dont the politicians eat it first for a few years and tell us then. safe to probably say none of it will end up on there table for dinner i reckon.
|
|
|
|
January 15th, 2008, 04:53 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
EF Big Dog
offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 292
Thanks given: 515
757 thanks in 224 posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildstang
well if the cloned meat is so safe why dont the politicians eat it first for a few years and tell us then. safe to probably say none of it will end up on there table for dinner i reckon.
|
Yep I agree. Time for me to go Vegan!
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
Favorite meat
|
joker13 |
Extreme Fitness Cafe |
35 |
May 13th, 2006 01:41 PM |
|
Tofu like meat?
|
ABN I Man |
Food & Recipes |
10 |
April 7th, 2006 12:23 AM |
|
Meat your Protein needs
|
cheezewhiz |
Nutrition & Weight Loss Discussion |
15 |
October 14th, 2005 09:15 AM |
|
Is Deli meat bad?
|
burntrat |
Food & Recipes |
5 |
September 6th, 2005 01:15 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 AM.
|
|